|
The diagram shows that by
looking at a planet light years away from us we actually would be
looking at images coming from different areas of planet, but on the same
angle. Images from thousands of miles apart from each other are entering
into eye or camera one after each other and mistakenly they appear to be
from the same point. By looking at a planet or star for a
period of time, or exposing a film to the planet for long will result in
capturing wrong images. Since the first person attached a camera to a
telescope to take a picture of a planet they came into this habit of
exposing the film to light for a long time. Astronomers expose the film
to light sometimes for minutes and hours. This practice will result in
registration of multiple images from different part of planet thousands
of miles apart onto the film creating one image. The final result would
be an image that contains a lot more images from 'sometimes the whole'
planet.
Light
beams that had left the planet light years ago now travel sideways and
now are turned into "Layers" rather than straight beams. These layers are now
positioned one after each other, by exposing a film to these layers we
are actually registering multiple layers that are from different part of
planet. For example using Earth, if we put our prospect one thousand
light years away and look directly at the planet we will see everything
from east to west. We can take a photograph of anything from Shanghai
all the way to London onto one image that the film is exposed to light
for a few minutes. To avoid this multiple registration of images onto
films we must stop exposing them to light for long period of time. Layers must be
captured at one time only rather than capturing multiple layers at once.
Exactly opposite of traditional way of photography, which is exposing
the film to lights from a planet for long time; a very fast speed camera
is needed to capture these layers. Although it is necessary to capture
more light as the light coming from distant planets are fainted and more
photons needed to register on film, but this is causing further problem.
With current tradition astronomers expose the film up to 20 minutes and
sometimes up to an hour of light, 20 minutes exposure will capture layers to
the thickness of 360,000,000Km. Earth rotates at 465m per second on its
axis, in 20 minutes the location on earth has moved 558Km from the previous position
- plus the distance it has traveled around sun,
imagine to start to photograph an object and by the time you close the shutter the
object has moved 558Km away and a new object is exposing.
Scientists do compensate this
movements by adjusting the telescope or receiver dish by moving it at the
same rate as earth rotates, but this only corrects the problem at our side,
when the light/signal comes from a planet nothing can compensate the shifted
signals generated from that planet.
To overcome this
problem we need a very fast shutter speed to cut these movements. For example a camera with 1/1000 of a
second shutter speed can capture a layer of 300Km thick. If the shutter
speed is set to a faster action like 1/2000 or 1/4000 of a second it can
capture 150Km and 75Km of these layers consequently. The faster shutter
speed of the camera is, the thinner the capture of the layers is. If we
have a camera with the shutter speed of light, we can capture a layer
with the thickness of one kilometer. This image will be so sharp that
would show every details of that area. A proposal of cameras with Light
Speed Shutter (LSS) is currently submitted to camera manufacturers, for
further information click
here.
As explained before images
look blurry with the current tradition of photography. Every image taken
from a planet or star from a distant would look very similar due to this
blurriness.
|
