|
The effect on light starts from the time that
light leaves its source, same as radio signals. But, unlike radio signals
that we need the whole lot of signals to make something out of it, i.e. make
it audible, just a fragment of light is enough to register on film or eye
for further research.
The diagram shows how light leaves the
planet and how it travels.
As it shows when the planet is rotating on its axis, different area of
planet are exposed and positioned to observer. No matter what, we cannot
send signals more than 23.93 hours in length into space. At the start point
of transmission the signal is sent will travel 25,849,260,000Km by the
time the transmitter is set on the same position (almost, one day
disposition in sun's orbit) as it was before, after
earth has rotated on its axis. The next day transmission will not follow the
pervious day's transmission as the continuation of signal is not there any
more. The transmission is a continues fact, but the path the signals take is
not connected. There is a 24 hour distance between each day of transmission
from the beginning of previous transmission to the new beginning of the next
day transmission. This length of signal can be variable due to the diameter
of different planets. You might dispute this and say we're sending
signals for 100 years to the length of trillions and trillions of
kilometers, but the fact is everyday is an individual day, and every
signal is sent has nothing to do with the pervious day signal sent, they do not
connect.
This
diagram shows the direction of light and how they turn sideways. By
looking at a planet we can see different areas of planet all at the same
time. By looking at a planet from distant as we receive light and see
the planet, we assume the lights are coming like a beam directly from
the planet. If you turn a powerful torch in dark you will see the beam
of light goes to the sky and seems that it is going for ever the same
way that we see it at time. If we move the torch from side to side very
fast we still can see the beam the same way and not notice the movement
to the structure of beam. But if the beam is powerful enough to travel
thousands of years after this period of time if you could the light it
would not look like a beam anymore. Instead it will look like spread and
wide area of light. Using a normal torch is sending light to a wider
area and as the light travels further from source its radius widens,
using a torch that sends a perfect parallel of beams is meant to be
used.
If lights collected from a planet for research and to see how the speed
of light would be after traveling an approximately 1,000,000,000 light
years, this collection of lights cannot be used as they are not from the
same source. These light fragments and particles are collected from many different "Layers",
and every layer has its own spectrum characteristics. Some layers come
from lower part of spectrum and some come from higher end of spectrum.
After a considerable time of travel, photons of one beam of light that
are generated from the same source are moved and mixed with other
photons of different beam from different source. Some would say if a
light is collected from a star it has the same characteristics, as the
whole star is the only source of light. It is true if you are looking at
the star from within a solar system or galaxy, but if you are going to
study the star from a distance of 1b light years, it would
be different as every fragments and particles of light are traveling sideways.
Radio signals and light loose density as they travel further from a
planet or star and slowly after traveling billions of light years they
have less photons and signals per square inch than the beginning.
This is important to
know that after a considerable time of travel
light and
radio signals lose their density before they lose their strength. This is
exactly opposite of what we are told by scientists, they believe radio signals
and light lose their strength before they disappear. They believe the
disappearance of signals are as the result of loss of their energy, they do not
have any explanation in the result of loss of density as they do not have a good
understanding of wave-shift to this level, or they are not taking the wave-shift
serious. We have not heard anything about the loss of density from the
scientists as they do not relate the density and wave-shift as a common problem.
Areas of space that we observe with the most powerful telescopes and see totally
black and believe there are no stars is not a correct statement. Due to the loss of density
we do not receive enough light from the planets/stars from that area; that is
why we see the area black, the darkness does not mean there are no planet/stars in that
area. Scientists have observed stars from 11 billion light years from earth,
does it mean in the distance of 12 billion light years from earth there are no
stars and the space has reached its limits? Not at all, to see beyond this limit
we have to change our point of view and move our telescopes closer to the
stars in that area. For example move the telescope to a billion light year from
earth so we can see that area. Not that is possible in practical terms to put our telescope a
billion light year from earth, but in theory it is important to make such
assumptions.
At the distance of 1b light
years one beam of light mixes up with many other beams of light which
were generated thousands of miles apart with a totally different
characteristics and from totally different source. Some scientists by examining
lights that have traveled billions of light years would think that the
speed of light is reduced as the result of distance of travel, but this
theory cannot be right as they are not able to examine the same beam of light
from the same source; even though if scientists would show this
reduction of speed in lab. By examining different layers of light it cannot
be determined that the speed of light is whether reduced, increased or
is the same; the same amount of light from the same source cannot be
collected due to rotation of the planet or star. The photons at the beginning of test are from different
source than the photons from the end of test.
It might be said that if a
light is coming from a star it would be the same as the star is
producing light at its entire surface. A star is producing light at its
entire surface not in the same intensity, by studying our own Sun, it
shows brighter areas and darker areas all over the surface. This means
there are different light arrays that are generated with different characteristics.
With planets there are some areas that are not producing light at all and
there are areas just a few miles away that produce a lot of light,
i.e. a volcano that is very active when the planet rotates into dark
side, or light is reflected from a sea that acts like a mirror.
|